The Choice Is Now
Dedicated to the pursuit of intellectualism, pragmatism, rationality, logic, reason, deconstructing patently false beliefs, and eradicating abject stupidity.

Why I’m Pro-Choice

September 22nd 2008 in Uncategorized

I’ve done it. I’m successful.

And I’m feeling it.

I’ve entered the third trimester.

With the third trimester has come serious growing pains—literally. I no longer have ankles. I have tree-trunk legs. Beautiful, motherly tree-trunk legs. My belly is huge (no stretch marks yet, thankfully), and last time I checked I had about 4 chins. My favorite thing in the world is chocolate milk—I drink it by the gallons—and I have become head-over-heels-over-head-over-heels (since I was originally head-over-heels) in love with my husband all over again and again and again. It could be the oxytocin and other deadly combinations of hormones flooding my system, but I prefer to think of it as the evolutionary need to stick by your baby daddy (rather than standing by your man).

Things are going well here, though, on the whole. In less than three months, I will be bringing a child into this world—and I’m loving every minute of it.

And this has elicited some interesting reactions from those who know me, both online and physically. They ask me, “Are you still pro-choice?”

I have never been more pro-choice than I am right now, if that’s even possible.

I admit that I find the underlying reason for the question a bit ridiculous. After all, they’re asking me this because they’re assuming, somehow, that carrying to term makes a person anti-choice by default. Don’t all pro-choicers want to kill babies?

One truth of the matter is that I used to be a counselor. I was a counselor at a women’s clinic. I counseled women pre- and post-abortion. If they chose to carry to term, I helped them as best I could. Perhaps they needed to find a parenting class or adoption agency. I helped them. Or, if they chose to terminate, I would go through their procedures with them, holding their hands and supporting them every step of the way, if they needed it. It was the most rewarding job I ever had.

Another truth of the matter is that the stigmas and stereotypes surrounding abortion—the disinformation, the propaganda, the religion-driven emotivism—cloud the actual argument. No matter how complicated people want to make the discussion, no matter how complex they claim this debate actually is, the truth is that it’s really simple: Should a pregnant woman be forced, by law, to carry to term? If you say yes, you’re anti-choice. In other words, you don’t want the option of abortion available, legal, and accessible. If you say no, then you’re pro-choice. You want the option of abortion available, legal, and accessible. You are not “pro-life.” I don’t even know what that means. I assume it’s a nice euphemism for “anti-choice,” or worse, that contradictory and morally disgusting position that rests on the premise that “abortion is acceptable if the pregnancy is a product of incest or rape.” (Since when did context of conception determine whether someone or something has rights?)

People can muck everything up by claiming that a fetus has rights (which it doesn’t because it can’t), or that women who have abortions do so for “convenience” (which is pretty much the driving motivation for everything we do) and are thus “morally lazy,” or that a six-week fetus looks like this (and only a cold-blooded killer would harm something so precious), but all of this is nothing more than distraction from the actual argument.

They can use emotion and disinformation all they want. They can try to convince pregnant women to change their minds via guilt, coercion, religion/supernatural bullshit, or anything else. But one thing they don’t have as a tool is the truth.

The truth is that abortion needs to be accessible, legal, and safe for a myriad of reasons, some based on pragmatism, some on principle, but all rational thought leads us to the same conclusion: abortion is a social necessity, even a social good, and to deny women the option of abortion is to force them to carry to term.

The criminalization of abortion is diametrically opposed to the tenets of a free society. Any element of force that has no rational basis in reality is unethical. The criminalization of abortion forces women to carry to term. That in itself is unethical. It infringes on the right to liberty. That in itself is unethical. It lays the private and emotional decision at the feet of the government rather than the individual. That in itself is unethical. It gives more rights to a fetus that cannot have rights than to the sentient being carrying the fetus who already has rights. That in itself is unethical.

People may want to frame these as follows: women should carry to term and be willing to give up nine months for a pregnancy they themselves created, the right to liberty is not as important as the right to life, the government makes the laws, and the fetus can have rights.

And this is all bullshit. No one should be forced to sacrifice anything; the right to liberty cannot be arbitrarily denied (especially by some phantom “right to life” someone thinks a fetus has); the government may make laws, but it doesn’t have the Constitutional power to force women to carry to term; and two entities—one sentient, one not—occupying one body cannot have equal rights, so thus the nonsentient entity has no rights.

Pregnancy is a sacrifice—a very important one at that—and it has to be a sacrifice women are willing to make, to work through, and to bear—both the benefits and the suffering. No one else can make the decision except the individual herself. Carrying to term or terminating a pregnancy should never be forced upon anyone. The decision rests alone on the person carrying the pregnancy. To advocate for anything other than the absolute legal status, complete accessibility, and utter safety of abortion is an injustice and a slap in the face to women everywhere.

I could never imagine what it must be like to be forced to carry a pregnancy to term, to be forced to have to make the decision to either carry to term or risk my life in order to terminate the pregnancy, but someone told me about it. I recently received this email, which was a response to another article I wrote on abortion:

im really happy about what u said, that Pregnancy should not decide anything—pregnancy should be decided and desired.

im 26 year old woman, from the philippines, im 5 weeks pregnant now, and abortion is not legal, so many young girls were trapped in their unwanted pregnancies..it was really terrible, i wanna terminate my pregnancy but no clinic or medical help is available, that’s why women like me are forced to have self induced abortion or to go illegal abortionists just get the work done..it endangers the life of the mother but no choice, that’s the risk we have to take..

im planning to have a self induced abortion on my 6th week of pregancy for at that time the drug that i ordered thru the internet will arrived, for these kinds of drugs like misoprostol is banned here in the philippines, i dont even know how to take it, or what to do…ill just take it orally and see if sumthing happens, .. i hope to hear back from you again..thanks..

I just turned 27 this past Saturday, and I’m entering the third trimester. This woman is my age and halfway around the world. I made the right decision for me. I chose to try and conceive. I chose to carry to term. I made the best choice for me. This woman deserves that as well.

Women need to be trusted to make the best decisions for themselves. In the 21st century, it pains me to think I even have to write that, but I do. I have to shout it from rooftops, rationally and linearly explain it step by step, and assert myself at every turn, but you know something, in the end it doesn’t really change anyone’s mind. It pains me to think there are people out there who need to control women, their reproductive options, their bodies, and their minds, and this need supersedes the rational. It pains me to think anyone in a free country such as America could possibly think criminalizing abortion, protesting at abortion clinics, trying to end safe access to abortion, and trying to lie to women in the hopes of coercing them to make another decision is somehow the epitome of moral behavior.

This pregnancy has been a sheer joy for me, and it’s because I want to be pregnant that makes it so joyful. And that’s why I’m vehemently, rabidly, unabashedly, and adamantly pro-choice.


58 comments to...
“Why I’m Pro-Choice”
Avatar
Paul Sunstone

First, Kelly, let me congratulate you on your pregnancy! :) I too am adamantly pro-choice. I don’t believe I — or anyone else — has any right to tell someone they must have a child. Moreover, I think most women make the decision that is right for them. After all, they are the person closest to the situation and the best informed on it.


Avatar
Ordinary Girl

Kelly, this is a fantastic article.

I was brought up to believe that abortion is murder. It’s been difficult to get past that belief because it’s such an emotionally charged issue, or at least it’s been made that way by people who support no choice. It was reading Letter to a Christian Nation that really drove it home to me that a collection of cells does not make a person.

I still have some issue with late-term abortions. I don’t know the answer or if it’s something I’ll ever resolve internally. I don’t like the idea of forcing someone to continue an unwanted pregnancy. But I don’t like the idea of ending the life of something that might be sentient. What if it’s late enough for that life to survive outside the womb?

I don’t think that argument though should limit abortion. Most abortions are early term and most late term abortions are for medical reasons and very few people would debate that a mother has a right to choose between her own life and someone else’s life.

Thanks for helping me clarify further my own struggle with the issue.


Avatar
Jen

Lovely post. I’m a mother, and couldn’t possibly agree with you more. My experiences also made me even more strongly pro-choice, and for exactly the same reasons.

Best of luck with the last part of your pregnancy :)


Avatar
Rick Sparks

This article is excellent. I’d like to link to it on my web site. Please let me know if you mind.

Cheers!


Avatar
lynx

a great article and a great argument. and congratulations to you and your baby daddy!


Avatar
Atlanticslamon

Congratulations on your pregnancy!

A brilliant article! You did an excellent job of pointing out the flaws of the whole ‘pro-choice’ issue.I am also pro-choice, by your definition. Can i link this article to my blog?


Avatar
Jasper

Then: To achieve the ‘Final solution of the Jewish question in Europe’,
the NAZIs long before had put into motion a process to ‘de-humanize’
the Jewish people. It was argued that the Jews were a sort of
’sub strata’ of the human species and that these ‘non-humans’
could be done away with wholesale and without any moral consequence.

Now: To achieve abortion on demand, a deliberate campaign was
set into motion to de-humanize the preborn child. The argument
was made that the preborn child was anything but human. It was
a ‘zygote’, ‘blob of tissue’, ‘fetus’, ‘product of conception’ etc. etc.
It was argued that these ‘non-humans’ could be done away with if one so
chose, and without any moral consequence.


Avatar
Kat

Thanks.

I love the way you showed “Pro-life” being a euphemism for “anti-choice”. Too bad more rational people don’t think this way.

Recently, in our city’s fall parade a “Pro-life” float handed out rubber fetuses as treats to the kids. It was completely inappropriate, and maybe those who passed them out could learn a thing or two from you. :)


Avatar
Brittany May

I’m amazed by this. You are an absolute genius. You’ve put the argument of every pro-choice person into the most intelligent and eloquent words possible. I absolutely admire you.
And I’m so putting this in a facebook note. =]


Avatar
Cattie

The author said: “The truth of the matter is that the stigmas and stereotypes surrounding abortion…cloud the actual argument.” I completely agree with this statement. There IS a ton of misinformation and propaganda surrounding the issue of abortion. Like the belief that an unborn baby isn’t yet a living thing, the lexicon used with women considering abortion (full of euphemisms for the procedure, and, depending on the place you go, tons of propaganda and fact-bending to pressure women into abortion), and anti-life distractions from the actual argument (such as severing the ties between full-grown humans and unborn babies – by referring to the unborn baby as a fetus, a pregnancy, or some similar clinical term instead of a baby or a person, it enables the woman not to think of the abortion as actually taking the life of a person, but rather “ending a pregnancy,” “terminating,” or “having a procedure.”).

I also agree that the truth is what is most important when it comes to this issue. However, I would argue that the truth is not quite how the author presents it here.

Truth #1: Abortion is taking a life. No matter how hard you argue, the truth remains that when a woman is pregnant, there is a life, a person, growing inside her. This truth is clouded by abortion supporters because it is infinitely easier to kill something you can’t see. If a woman does not think it is an actual baby inside her, but rather an impersonal, not-quite-named thing, she would be much more likely to feel all right with abortion.

Truth #2: Abortion is dangerous, both to the woman and obviously to the unborn child. Many abortion supporters tend to downplay this fact, or not mention it at all.

Truth #3: Planned Parenthood, arguably the most famous advocate of abortion, has some pretty sketchy roots. Margaret Sanger, the organization’s founder, had racism-laden philosophies about life. A proponent of eugenics, she agreed with the philosophy that some humans were not fit to live (a theory shared by Hitler – indeed, the theory behind his campaign to commit genocide against the Jews), and thus she advocated abortion. A famous quote of hers: “The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind.” And Planned Parenthood today continues to bend facts and bombard with propaganda the earnest women who visit them looking for answers and facts and solutions. Have you seen their website? There is a great deal more information on abortion than any other option, and the lexicon used is very pro-abortion, downplaying the health risks and playing up the convenience. This is scary to me – I know this article isn’t primarily about Planned Parenthood, but since the information is relevant, I thought I’d throw that out there.

And honestly, the “anti-choice” moniker kind of pushes my buttons. Obviously I am anti-abortion, but I am not anti-choice. In fact, I’m much more likely to refer to myself as “pro-choice” – but not in the way the term is usually used. I think a woman should have all the facts (including the ones abortion clinics so conveniently leave out) before she makes any kind of decision about her pregnancy. I know so many women who chose abortion because they didn’t think they had any other options. Some of them were teens, some of them were married, you name it. They just felt like they had nowhere to turn, no other option but to abort the baby – often dangerously, and in secret because they felt so ashamed about the whole thing (either the pregnancy or the abortion).

The truth is that there are so many other options besides abortion that I think should be stressed over abortion – specifically because it does involve the ending of a human life. No matter how much pro-abortion folks try to cover this up, this decision is one that directly affects another human life. One option that I think is under-explored is adoption. Carrying a baby to term does not mean you must spend the next 18 years and beyond as a parent if you cannot, or do not want to. If a woman feels she cannot make the commitment as a parent right now, there are thousands of couples who are dying for just such a commitment. What makes me sad is that the adoption waiting lists are so long, while the abortion numbers are so huge.

Abortion supporters will say in response that a woman should not be “forced” to carry to term, as it puts a lot of potentially unwanted strain on her body. Here’s the thing, folks. I personally think that is pure selfishness. In my view, there ARE certain, rare situations in which abortion would be acceptable – the only one I can think of right now being if the pregnancy would directly and definitely take the life of the woman. The other excuses people use are rubbish. Honestly, I have every sympathy for rape victims. And I can understand how a woman in that situation would make a rash and regrettable decision in such a psychologically harrowed state. However, I can only give my opinion, and say what I personally would do – which would be, if I were raped and found myself pregnant, and could not or did not want to care for the child myself, to carry the child to term and place him or her up for adoption. Yes, there would be certain sacrifices I would have to make to allow for the changes in my body. Yes, I would have to deal with a few things I hadn’t planned on. But if I ever have to choose between being comfortable and allowing someone a chance at life, I would hope I would choose the latter. Tell me, when what is on the line is a human life, isn’t the inconvenience worth it?

This is just my humble opinion, but I believe that is what it comes down to.


Avatar
Soraya

Hey there! Congratulations on your pregnancy! :)
I totally agree with your article and I think it’s fabulous that you can have a choice in the US. Unfortunately many countries like Colombia, in south America, have laws that make it illegal for women to get abortions unless it’s a rape victim, incest, or if it is really dangerous for the mother to have the baby. So that leaves hundreds of teenage girls forced to have babies at an age they can’t even take care of themselves, much lees a new born. I’m totally pro-choice, in a country that’s way too religious still.
I have never had to make such choice, in part because I’ve been really aware of what the options were if I got pregnant here, and in part because I had my older sister as a mirror to take a look at what really is having a baby when you don’t want to.
I’m 26 and pro-choice. A choice would have helped many women in developing countries have a better future, a better health, and for many it would have been the difference between life and death.

I’m glad to read your article and see there are people who think like me.


Avatar
Blue

Kel, I’m gonna have to disagree to your comment to Jasper that a fetus can’t be a person. My daughter had a very clear personality in utero and some of those same things have carried on into her days out of my womb. You may find the same true when your own child is born, you may not. But Sean and I both noticed that she had a definite personality before she was born.

And to Cattie… I’d just like to say that until you are actually in the headspace of having been freshly raped and finding out a month or two later that you are pregnant, I don’t think you can say “I would never…”.

That’s why I’m Pro-Choice. Until you’re in the position of actually having to make it, you don’t know how you will react. When I became pregnant I was terrified. But I knew that as much as I honored the choices of others, I knew that I could know personally have an abortion. Period. And after the initial terror wore off, I enjoyed my pregnancy and have loved every second with my daughter. (Even now when she’s getting all her terrible twos out.)


Avatar
Halliburton Shill

Very intelligent article. I agree completely with the deconstruction of “pro-life”. I’d take it a step further and say it’s a brand name intended for advertising and propaganda only. I’d take pro-choice a step further and say it’s an understatement that would be more accurately, if not more eloquently, stated as pro-woman-as-as-a-human-being.

The “pro-life” brand implicitly states those who disagree are anti-life. Pro-choice really doesn’t deal with that at a counter-brand level. It needs to say what’s really the case: “pro-life” is anti-woman-as-a-human-being. It’s pro-woman-as-a-piece-of-sex-meat (the uncensored version that’s actually going through most men’s minds would be piece of a$$ – and I say that as a man, a heterosexual man whose first reaction to a woman is still always a physical review and sex grade). I think that pro-choice really needs to address the innate belief among the “pro-life” that women are simply here to serve men and have no individual rights of their own – even sperm and stem cells have more rights. Sarah Palin would even pay for their protection whereas a woman can’t even get a rape kit out of her and her daughter is literally f”k’d-for-life.


Avatar
Vistaluna

@ Cattie

Here is the key argument that does it for me:

Let’s say someone is having kidney failure, and you are the only person in the world who can donate a compatible kidney. Does the government have the right to make you sacrifice your body to save someone else’s life? No. The government has no business forcing you to sacrifice your body to save the life of another. The government can take your money and property, but not your body. Even convicted killers cannot be forced to give up organs.

If there is a living thing growing inside of me, consuming my blood and my tissue, then I have the right to evict it, even if it’s my fault it’s there, and especially if it’s not my fault it’s there. Now, once the baby is born, I do have legal obligations to care for it or the government will take the child away. The government can also force me to give money to this child. But the government cannot force me to give up a kidney if my child needs one to survive. I would be a horrible parent if I chose to no donate a kidney to my own child, but nevertheless our rights to our own bodies trump all other rights.

And in the case of abortion, it’s even more obvious because the other person you are saving doesn’t even fully exist yet.

You want to give the child a chance? What about all the other eggs you’ve let out that didn’t get fertilized? You didn’t want to give them a chance too? Shouldn’t you be trying to fertilize every egg since every egg is just another child who needs a chance?

Why don’t you care about all the potential sperm and eggs that go to waste? I don’t see how someone can argue that an egg is just a cell, but if it received DNA from a sperm it’s now a person….even though it’s still a single cell. It’s the blueprint of a person, but that blueprint already existed in two halves in the sperm and the egg before. You glued together a blue-print, and you want to call THAT a living person?

It seems obvious to me (and it must not really be obvious since so few people agree with me) that becoming a person is a long process that starts with sperm and egg production, and ends when you are developed enough to really be aware and actively process the world around you. (This is roughly in the 3rd trimester). Everything in between is a varying degree of building the pieces needed to be a person, but not being a person.


Avatar
Kelly Gorski

I have no idea where all my comments went! I guess they disappeared into cyberspace.

@ Blue: Maybe I need to be more clear. I was talking about personhood in the legal sense.

@ Cattie: When did selfishness become a bad thing?

@ Jasper: Jews are persons with rights, including the right to life. Fetuses are not persons.


Avatar
Michelle Anzaldua

Wonderful article and congrats on your pregnancy, motherhood is wonderful!
I too was a counselor at an abortion clinic for five years. I am a mother and I am pro-choice. Working at that clinic was one of the best things I have ever done. The women that came in and needed and appreciated my help were the reason why I was there for five years. However, the women that came to our clinc two to four times a year were the reason why I quit. It’s women like that make it hard to keep abortions safe and legal. There are many women who use it as birth control and do not care what they are doing to their bodies. I have seen some patients come in there for 10 to 20 abortions in a matter of several years. I do and will always support abortions however it just saddens me that some women take advantage of a right that we work so hard to keep.


Avatar
Christina

I have yet to read a better argument in support of the Pro-Choice movement! Thank you for taking the time to write a well thought out piece. Sadly, no matter how logical or well thought out, some individuals can’t see past their own noses, as reflected by a few of the comments that you received. I just wish I could explain it this well when asked to support my stand.

Thanks Again


Avatar
Olga

Very good article, and I can’t agree more. And one more thing that can’t be repeated more often:

Being pro-choice does not mean that anyone *should* have an abortion. If you want to carry the baby to term, great! If you want to do this despite severe medical problems, or after being raped, or in an incest situation — my respect. But if for some reason you don’t want to have the baby, then legal abortion gives you this option. It’s an option, nothing more.

Personally, I’ve always been pro-choice. At the same time, I was also sure that I wouldn’t want an abortion for myself (assuming I wouldn’t get raped, in which case I might or might not have changed my mind).

How someone can enjoy pregnancy is beyond me though… I love having a child, but this whole pregnancy thing… Glad it’s over. Glad you’re enjoying it!


Avatar
Kate

Congrats on your lack of ankles. They usually come back. I just wanted to comment on your beautifully written piece. As a mother of two I completely agree with how you have become more pro choice. Get ready, you may become a real radical when you’re a mama bear. Enjoy and rest as much as you can!


Avatar
carly.

Never has anyone summed up the reasons for pro-choice better. This is especially informative and accurate, and it makes it better that it’s coming from a pregnant woman herself. I love that you’ve exploited all the steriotypes towards pro-choicers, and that you’ve really hit the topic of human rights. Well done.


Avatar
Sherry

The central issue is whether or not the fetus is a person. Most agree that when it is a single cell it is not a person. Most also agree than when it is one day from being born, it most certainly is a person. So then the question is, at what singular point during the pregnancy does the fetus become a person. You could argue that the fetus becomes a person on the day it could survive outside the womb. However, what about one day before this day? Could it not be a person then?

The fact is that you can never draw the exact line on when it becomes a person, and as such, to be pro-choice, you have to agree that the living baby inside your body, who could live by now, outside the womb, whose kicks you feel, and who would already have family resemblance in its features, is not a person. If you can get there great. Many can’t.

I was pro-choice until I had a miscarriage at 10 weeks. I saw my little baby, the size of a kidney bean, with eyes, hands, fingers and toes. Looking at him, through the tears, I most certainly knew that he was a person, even at this young gestational age.


Avatar
Molly

Since there are several comments about the Nazi’s extermination of the Jews, I feel I must point out that that is completely irrelevant to this discussion. The Nazis were participating in a calculated eradication of an entire race of people. What we today refer to as genocide. Nobody is forcing people to have abortions, nor are pro-choicers necessarily even advocating abortion; they simply want it to be an option. And yes, abortion is dangerous now…just imagine how dangerous it would be were it illegal.


Avatar
Cait

Pro-choice does NOT mean pro-abortion. No one is encouraging women to go out and have abortions.

The kidney argument is a good analogy. The use of your body is fundamentally yours to protect. You are not forced to donate blood at blood drives or be an organ donor, even when your life expires. Even upon death, your organs are yours and yours alone. Why is this different in cases of pregnancy?

@Cattie – By your argument, we should stop utilizing birth control and making the same information you say needs to be more readily available to women. Margaret Sanger, even if she held questionable and even deplorable views on racial issues, she still fought for contraception being made available to everyone. Her personal beliefs about race are irrelevant.

And as far as propaganda goes, the pro-life side has plenty of it to go around also. I don’t think harassing women as they enter the clinic (perhaps not even for an abortion) with gruesome pictures and hateful speech helps anyone and certainly isn’t in line with Christian teachings (for those that are Christian).

Abortion is not pretty. No one said it was. But it is not for you nor I to tell someone what is best for their body and life.

Those that are against abortion are the ones who should be screaming for the eradication of so called “abstinence-only” education. Youth have sex. It’s a fact and all the scare tactics and purity propaganda will never change that. If you don’t want people to have abortions, then let us arm our youth with the knowledge to protect themselves!


Avatar
v

I want to start by echoing what other have said in congratulations in your pregnancy! I am 27, single, with no children but have many friends with children. I loved watching them in their pregnancies! I also send my best to you, your baby daddy, and the wee one.

This is an excellent article! I’m very glad I stumbled upon it. One of my biggest reasons for being pro-choice is this: drugs like cocaine, marijuana, and heroin are illegal yet still prevalent in our country. However, if someone chooses to do those drugs, they can never be sure what they are laced with or what effects they will have on their bodies. Making something illegal does NOT automatically make it go away. Even if, somehow, abortion was made illegal, girls and women would still have abortions. However, they would not be safe. If I found myself in a situation where I felt abortion was my only option, I would much rather have Planned Parenthood to turn to in order to have a safe abortion than to go the wire hanger route. I’m not advocating making cocaine legal, but I am saying these women need a safe and legal option when it comes to their bodies.

Again, congrats and thank you for such a great article.


Avatar
Katy

Happy belated birthday, almost happy birthday to your baby, and congradulations to you and your boyo.

Thank you for a wonderful article. I’m a 22 year old college student, working through figuring out my morals more, and your article could not have come at a better time!Thank you for piecing out ideas that I couldn’t make flow together in my head.

I am in a committed, long term relationship, and this election is scaring me badly- what if the right wing Christian anti-abortion people win? I do everything I can to NOT be pregnant,both my boyfriend and I do not wish to have children. I can’t imagine not being able to find help when I need it.

Thanks again, enjoy shopping for tiny little shoes, and onesies!


Avatar
Sophitia

I am pro-life. And I understand the terror of being faced with raising a child. But killing a child is not the answer. There are alternatives. People who say a fetus is not a person is an idiot. We were all a fetus a one point and are we not people now? No one forces anyone to have children. I think everyone know where babies come from. Its a choice a person makes on their own to have sex. There are consequences and people who have abortions dont want to take responsibility. People give up babies because they are selfish and don’t want to care and give for a child properly. They want to go out and party and have more abortions, because “its such a hassle to get contraception.” So next time you pro-choice thinkers go get your abortion, I would think twice about why you are really doing it.


Avatar
Anj

What a well written article and also well reasoned… Congratulations on becoming a mother…

@ all of those who are saying that abortion is killing a child… I don’t think ANY one who is pro-choice would suggest that a woman has an abortion during their third trimester… which is the time period during which the foetus can survive outside of its mothers body… Much less FORCE then into having an abortion at that late stage… Pro-choice is exactly that protecting the woman’s choice to be pregnant or not..

I am a mother, I have also had an abortion… the method of contraception I was using failed and I ended up being pregnant again… My choice to abort I knew was right… I’m a single parent… at the time of my abortion my daughter was only three… I had also just started my degree… I couldn’t put myself (and daughter) through the stress of me raising another child… I have never regretted my decision… I don’t feel that I have murdered a child… But I do feel that I have helped make sure that the life that I did decide to bring into the world has a mother who can cope with the family she has to raise on her own…

Having an abortion… or going through with a pregnancy is a very personal decision… and anyone who would interfere with that must have very little respect for the notion of female empowerment…


Avatar
Jess Sanders

Thank you for sharing your experiences and point of view! A woman’s body is her own, and we need to protect that sacred right. Through your examples and in-the-trenches point of view, you keep that conversation alive. –Jess


Avatar
Erin

Beautiful, well written, well-reasoned article. Thank you. I do think that it is a little sad that this country still needs to be reminded that pro-choice individuals are compassionate people who care for life and for children.


Avatar
Anji

Love the article.

I wonder how many of these ‘pro-lifers’ whining about abortion being ‘the taking of a life’ eat meat?

Whether they like it or not, killing an animal is taking its life.

Then the question is ‘which lives are acceptable to take and which are not?’

No matter which way you try to argue it, the value of a foetus’s life is just as much based purely on opinion as the value of an animal’s life. They view the life of a foetus as important, just like I view the life of an animal as important. If I went around trying to make it illegal for people to kill animals based on my personal opinions I’d get laughed at. Why is it not just as ridiculous to push their personal opinions onto others?


Avatar
Colleen Rivera

I was adamantly, vehemently, pro-life (anti-choice) before I had children. Four precious, wonderful children later I no longer hold that stance. It is not because my children are not a blessing that I cherish more than anything in this world. It is *because* I consider them such a treasure that I feel it has to be a choice. I believe that every baby deserves to be born into a home that will consider them precious and valuable. A woman should not be coerced into bearing an unwanted child. Rather than talking about a baby’s “right to life” as if life was an end unto itself, I now feel that a baby’s right to a safe, secure, healthy, loving home in which it is a wanted and appreciated part is far more important. I support women who are faced with an unplanned pregnancy to consider all their options – whether that is termination or motherhood, or something else. But the key is that they should have choices, as well as the information, resources, and support that make those choices valid. All women deserve this, whether they are a 15 year old who wants to raise her child, or a 27 year old who wants to terminate, or a 32 year old who wants to make an adoption plan. Children are far too important and precious to have it any other way.


Avatar
Kathleen

Kelly, thank you for being so eloquent. I am a Christian 52yo woman, and I consider myself Pro-Choice and also Pro-Life. I have a very compelling reason for this, incest. I became pregnant by my father, at a time when abortion was not legal in most of this country. I considered having my child, but at the time I was under age and not ‘able’ by law to make such a decision. I had an abortion. I went on to become a counselor at a local free clinic. Never did I counsel a woman to have an abortion unless I was sure she understood all of her options, and I always made sure I was there by her side in whatever way she wished.

Some of the arguments I have read here have been made by caring people, but unless a person has been in such a position, I do not believe that they can know how they themselves would act.
I no longer believe that I should judge any other human, God alone, in my eyes, has that right. Compassion is the key to life, it is the first thing we should offer each other.

Kelly, I wish you all joy and happiness with your baby, and with your family!


Avatar
links for 2008-10-06 « Shut Up, Sit Down

[...] Why I’m Pro-Choice (tags: abortion) [...]


Avatar
Kitty

Kelly,
I will be sending this link to many of my friends who “need” to hear what you have to say. Thank you!
I know how wonderful it is to want a baby and carry it to term (congratulations!!). It is a sacrifice, but only the beginning … and SO worth it!
I also know how terrifying it is to be unexpectedly pregnant by an abusive man. The day I had my abortion, I read a story in the newspaper about a woman in the middle east who was stoned to death for becoming pregnant extra-maritally. She and I had done the same thing, get pregnant out of wedlock. I was able to take a pill, she was killed by her community with rocks! I wept for her injustice, and I wept with gratitude for my ability to choose.
Thank you!
K


Avatar
Kate

Compassion and understanding; this is all we need. If you don’t want an abortion, don’t have one. If you do, have one. We should all be able to live our lives the way we want to. Pro-choice forever.


Avatar
Jeremy S

Very inspiring article. You are so right, Pro-Lifers are really Anti-Choicers, which ironically is unamerican (since the Right claim to be uber patriotic).

Like most moral issues in this world, there is no absolute truth. Any opinion is valid, and as a free country, we should respect the opinions of others as valid as our own.

I hope that any woman or girl out there understands that this is her decision alone. She may have been abandoned, raped, date raped, not live if she goes through labor, impregnated through incest, too young to have a child, not want another child, or just can’t afford a child. It’s their decision.

These are problems men do not have to deal with.


Avatar
Michelle Gohr

It is a strong woman like you who have led us all as women to where we are today. Its still so sad that even though this patriarchal nation tries to tell us we have so many rights, we still barely have rights to our very own bodies. If we are forced to carry children and bring them into the world what kind of a life are these children going to lead? They will be raised by struggling, unwanting mothers. No child, nor mother should have to deal with that kind of life. Controlling the choices of women only leads to a world and a people filled with regret and contempt.


Avatar
Aimee Ault

I just found your article through Stumble Upon, and I really enjoyed it. I use the term “anti-choice” in debates quite often, for sake of clarity, but it kills me how people are so swayed by the term “pro-life” that they perceive me using “anti-choice” to describe them as negative rhetoric more so than me just being clear and truthful.

Perhaps I’m naive though, because I don’t really think anyone terminates a pregnancy out of laziness, as so many people will try to argue. If you come to the conclusion that you need to terminate, then bringing a child into the world will likely not be good, whether it’s because you are not emotionally ready to do so, physically, or financially. People assume that abortions are hastily made decisions and what they fail to consider is that the women who choose to have them feel sorrow and remorse for having to do so, even if it was the right decision to make. I’m glad that women that have them often seek counseling because abortion really isn’t something anyone should have to go through alone.

The e-mail you quoted frightens me and makes me worry. I worry about how many young girls self-induce abortion through dangerous means, posing significant risks to their own body in doing so–even in the United States.

I hope I never have to have an abortion, but as a woman, I could never stop defending my right and every other woman’s right to say what is best for her own body. Thanks for writing this article. It was great.


Avatar
Al Dinkle

Do you have cankles? Those things always creeped me out.


Avatar
Kelly Gorski

Yes, Dink. Yes I do. Only some days though.


Avatar
Al Dinkle

Are you the moderator? Why is e-mail mandatory?


Avatar
Kelly Gorski

I want to stalk you. That’s why e-mail is mandatory. Don’t worry. No one else will know it but me.


Avatar
Allen

Stalked by a pregnant lady. Cool.


Avatar
SCB

True, I agree. It’s actually scary if you go to a clinic that offers abortions, they are locked down like a fortress. I go to the Planned Parenthood, in downtown Pittsburgh, to get birth control. They offer abortion services there, it’s scary with people protesting there. I wish people were just more rational about a woman’s right to choose.


Avatar
Courtney

Thank you for writing this entry, your words are so eloquent and poignant. I wish that everyone could read this because it says exactly how I feel. Congratulations on your pregnancy and thank you again for writing this!


Avatar
Erin W.

I really enjoyed reading this. I’m currently in the process of re-examining my beliefs on most everything I came to believe when I was in school. It recently hit me that I haven’t looked over what I think and feel about these big issues since I was 17 (I just turned 25) and perhaps I don’t feel the same way.
I’ve found that most of my beliefs have evolved as I’ve aged, and they didn’t really need the attention. But some, like abortion, I’m not so sure about anymore. I was very adamantly pro-choice. Since then, I’ve had one daughter, and I’m in the middle of my second trimester with my second child. I think that I’m coming to the conclusion that while abortion isn’t for me, I still believe that I have no right to refuse it to someone else.
Anyway, articles like these really help me define my views, so thanks for writing it.


Avatar
Amber

I’m 4 weeks along right now. I’m 21 years old. I’m in college. I’m joining the peace corp. I want to have my life. I’m glad I stumbled across your article…because now I’ve made the decision to not carry this fetus to term. Thank you.


Avatar
Amy

I really like your article. I’m a 17 year old girl and could not imagine being forced to carry a pregnancy against my will. I think too much emphasis is put on morals, the whole, “if you have an abortion you’re a bad person and have no morals.”

I don’t think a person can just make their mind up about something they’ve never been through but a lot of people do and it’s unfair.


Avatar
Sopia

I have a couple of things to say.

Pro-Choice and Pro-Life are both disgusting words for this political debate. They sound so fluffy both of them and do not shed any light on the real issues.

The question is not “does a fetus have rights” particularly. I know American’s love rights and framing their law around “rights” but there is more to the law than rights. You ask, should a woman be forced to carry to term if she gets pregnant. A (eew) “pro-life” person would undoubtedly frame it “should a woman be able to kill a human being if that human being is inside them and entirely dependent on them – and no-one else – for sustainance”. The argument that a fetus is not a human being is disingenuous. It is clearly a human being, it may well be a human so underdeveloped as to lack most of the faculties we think are important in human beings, but so are other classes of human beings, such as those in vegetative states, those with very severe disablements etc. One difference is unlike most of those other groups of human beings, a fetus is more likely to develop those capacities.

Does this mean abortion is wrong? Only if you think its always wrong to kill a human being, plenty of abortion advocates are also euthanasia advocates – that is a consistent position based on the application of utilitarian ethics, a position I abhor, but can respect for its consistency.

Equally, thinking that killing people is wrong doesn’t mean that you think it should be illegal. Now in America they might frame laws against murder as a protection of everyone’s “right to life” but personally I prefer to frame it as an enforcement of everyones “duty to abstain from killing”. In the first case you have made the person being killed the central theme of the law, and thus when that person is inconvenient, without a voice and as yet lacking in sentience – you feel perfectly justified in – at the very least saying that they’re right to life is diminished, in saying that someone else’s “right” to have sex without consequences overrides the rights of this as yet nonsentient being. Whereas the way I see it is that everyone having a duty not to kill people, has a duty not to kill people regardless of the current level of awareness of those people.

And I think it is this which is the real crux of the argument as well as another issue, that is generally those in favour of abortion are in favour of pre-marital sex and in some cases do seem to think of sex as a human right itself). But I think the core issue is one which looks at law in terms of rights, which in practice whatever high ideals some might have, are not “natural” or “inherent” but are granted by the state, and which looks at law in terms of human social duties. And also on the one hand to see “the pursuit of happiness” as the key social value – people in favour of legal abortion may see it that way, but it does not need to be so.

What bothers me about this argument is the seeming blindness of (shudder) “pro-choice” people to the views of their opponents, the complete lack of understanding they have. As if to oppose the killing of a human in the womb was somehow incomprehensibly reactionary. Its not about progressive or reactionary. It’s really not hard to appreciate the real arguments for both sides.


Avatar
Rugby

How sad. Especially the comments like “forced to carry a pregnancy against my will”, as if the baby somehow placed itself into a mother’s womb. The baby is innocent and deserves the same chance at life that we all have. You mentioned a fetus has no rights. Who else in your mind has no rights- the mentally retarded, the terminally ill, a person in a coma? No one person should ever be allowed to take away the rights of another, especially if that person has been entrusted with the care of the other.
Every person deserves a chance at life. Please choose life.


Avatar
Andrew

Very well written article and very interesting argument. My only complaints would be idealogical differences, in that i find “Pro-choice” just as misleading as “Pro-life”… I tend to use the terms “Pro-abortion” or “Anti-abortion,” as the argument does not purely pertain to choice or life, rather it is the debate of abortion and should be referred to as such. Also, I did not completely understand the argument against the rights of an unborn fetus. Those, of course, are merely differences in out ideas, and do not change the integrity of this article and the ideas presented. Nicely done.


Avatar
Angel

This is a very sad article! The comments after it are even sadder. Comparing a human life to an animal just doesn’t make sense. There was a person who talked of terminating a pregnancy to join the peace corp?! How can the most violent act against your own child be peaceful? Who can you help if you could not help your own child at its most defenseless time?


Avatar
RB

A woman’s body IS her own to do with however, and she does deserve to make her own choices and on the topic of abortion her first choice is whether or not to have sex. people having abortions should not be having sex. why aren’t more people encouraging abstinence instead of encouraging or defending abortion?

http://anonymouscontroversy.blogspot.com/2008/11/pro-life.html


Avatar
Laura Wilson

What seems to lie at the heart of the endless debate between pro-choice and pro-life people is this question of whether or not, and when, a fetus is an actual person, with rights equivalent to those of a born human.

This is the question upon which the pro-lifers and pro-choicers simply cannot agree. There’s a reason for that: it’s a profoundly difficult question. The Supreme Court justices, in Roe v. Wade, recognized how impossible it was for them to answer it. They realized, after examining all the science, history and philosophy on the subject, that there was no way to settle this as a matter of law. So what did they do? They decided that up until about 22 weeks, it’s completely impossible to answer that question for everyone, and that ONLY the woman involved can answer it.

That is, up until the point of viability, any woman living in the United States can decide for herself whether or not she carries her child to term, or has an abortion. (Since then, the Court has allowed some states to impose some conditions of the process of getting that abortion, but the fundamental right remains).

The Supreme Court recognized that after viability, the government (meaning individual states) may have a compelling interest in protecting the life of the fetus, since it could conceivably survive on its own apart from the woman’s body.

This is the state of things now. Doesn’t it seem fairly reasonable? It never fails to amaze me how the “pro-lifers” have some sort of problem with this. If you don’t like abortion, or if you think a 5 week old fetus is a person and it would qualify as murder to abort it, then, for chrissakes, don’t have an abortion! No one says you have to. Roe v. Wade certainly doesn’t.

I worked for Planned Parenthood for 12 years counseling women who were deciding what to do about their pregnancies. Believe me, Planned Parenthood doesn’t recruit women for the abortions they perform. It doesn’t work that way. If you decide that you want to have an abortion, you have to pick up the phone and call for an appointment. You have to be able to state clearly over the phone that this is what you want. When you get to the clinic, if you still want the abortion, you have to sign a bunch of consent forms, and then you have to talk to a counselor, and you have to be able to say that this is what you want, and that no one is forcing you. In the process, you receive a lot of information, both written and verbal, about how abortion works, what the (incredibly minimal) risks are, and how to take care of yourself afterwards.

Don’t panic, pro-choicers. No one wants to force you to have abortions!


Avatar
Shay

What a truly wonderful blog post!!! Not only did you share the joy of being pregnant and the wonderful feelings behind it, but also just because pregnancy is an amazing feeling at one time in life for one woman, doesn’t mean it is like that for every woman.
My heart goes out to the lady in the Philippines and I hope like crazy that the medicine she will drink does the job but also doesn’t harm her at all.

Congrats on your pregnancy and thanks for sharing your story and yay for still being pro-choice, as I don’t understand why anyone would want to be anti-choice. :D


Avatar
Jeanne

In cases of rape and if the woman may not survive, then i agree with abortion completely, so i do agree with keeping abortion legal but i think it should be regulated.

But, why do so many woman act like getting pregnant was so unexpected? they had sex, so its certainly possible that they may get pregnant. I was in class with a bunch of girls that kept on getting abortions because babies were simply an inconvenience. Abortion should not be used as birth control. If you aren’t ready for a baby then stop having sex.


Avatar
Maria

I will never debate abortion with someone. I have my personal belief that it is wrong and I am raising my children the same way. After all, had I believed otherwise, 2 of my 3 wonderful children would not be here. I’ve known women who had abortions and regretted it fully, I’ve known women who’ve had several abortions and do not care which saddens me. There are birth control ways that are almost fool proof (if you don’t want a baby get sterilized, period).

Anyhow, here I am pregnant with #4 and I am happy and looking forward to the birth of my last child. I am 34 years old and my husband is younger than I am but I am happy and cannot wait to set up my first baby room and nursery (this child will be sharing a room with his/her 2 year old sister).

I’m pro-choice, and raising my daughters to be as such too.

Happily the mother of 3 (soon to be 4)


Avatar
Brook

I find it sickening that women, especially women with children can sit here and say that they are pro-choice. After seeing all of the amazing things that are happening inside of you. I’m pregnant, just turning 20 and a baby wasn’t in my plan for myself at this point but never once did I think of terminating a life. Abortion is NOT part of society and every day life. If you cannot provide for your child, put it up for adoption.

My mother had an abortion at a very young age and to this day she regrets it. She also said that she never knew the truth about abortion. So rather than sit here and talk about how normal it is, maybe we could write about the horrifying facts. Whether you like it or not, aborting a baby is taking a life. To me it doesn’t sound like any of us are worthy of making that decision.




required



required - won't be displayed


Your Comment:

Calling All Skeptical Parents!

A friend sent me this. I thought I’d share it with all of you. I hope they allow me to write for them. It would be great to meet like-minded people who are also parents. If you’re a critically thinking, rational, skeptical parent, I encourage you to e-mail Jessie.

Text:
ARE YOU A RATIONAL MOM? by Phil [...]

Calling All Skeptical Parents!Previous Entry

Reality, Ethics, and Politics

Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps down new roads armed with nothing but their own vision.
–Ayn Rand
The history of humanity has been quite clear in its narrative: it has been a select few, a handful of people, who held convictions, principles, and merit far beyond their peers, who have impacted human [...]

Reality, Ethics, and PoliticsNext Entry

Categories